Prop. 8′s Day in Court Begins With ‘Standing’
a.stbar.chicklet img {border:0;height:16px;width:16px;margin-right:3px;vertical-align:middle;}a.stbar.chicklet {height:16px;line-height:16px;}
Prop. 8's Day in Court Begins With 'Standing' - Civil Rights - Law and Daily Life
FindLaw | Find a Lawyer. Find Answers. Are you a legal Professional? Visit our professional siteLearn about law firm marketing Learn About the Law Find a Lawyer FindLaw Answers Forms & Store News Blogs Search

Prop. 8's Day in Court Begins With 'Standing' By Laura Strachan on December 6, 2010 12:06 PM | No TrackBacks
All eyes are on San Francisco today as the high-profile Prop. 8 appeal beings with an interesting legal question: Do these particular parties even have the right to argue this case?
Arguments in the Prop. 8 appeal begin with two one-hour sessions devoted to standing and the constitutionality of the voter-approved proposition that defined marriage as between a man and a woman. The latest Proposition 8 arguments represent an appeal of the highly-publicized August ruling by Vaughn Walker that found Prop. 8 to be in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
The basic legal principle of standing is first up before the judges, and it will serve as a gatekeeper for the second argument. Specifically, the issue before the 9th Circuit will be whether Imperial County (where voters overwhelmingly supported the proposition) and other members to the suit have the right to bring the issue before the court in the first place.
Essentially, the randomly chosen three-judge panel will determine if ProtectMarriage, a group that may not be directly affected by the latest Prop. 8 ruling, can even bring their case. The panel will also hear whether a California county, and not the state that regulates marriage, can bring their appeal.
ProtectMarriage and Imperial County will argue that their standing rests on a technicality -- that each represents voters that supported Prop. 8 and that Imperial County issues marriage licenses that are affected by a ruling in favor of same sex marriages.
Although cleverly crafted legal arguments will certainly be presented on both sides, a successful standing argument likely will require a personal legal interest rather than a general interest. The court will be looking at whether the challengers have suffered an actual injury by same-sex marriages.
If the court should rule that the challengers lack standing, then there would be no further inquiry because there would be no challenger and same-sex marriage would be permitted in California. Of course, the panel could rule they do have standing and then turn to the merits of the constitutionality of the case. The case is being broadcast on television, radio and the internet, as the outcome could have far-reaching effects in California and the rest of the country.
Related Resources:
Proposition 8: All Eyes On Appeals Court Panel (LA Times)Standing (FindLaw)Prop 8 Found Unconstitutional By Federal Court (FindLaw's Decided)
Categories: Civil Rights, Family Law Tags: prop 8, proposition 8, same sex marriage, standing, vaughn walker
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/18391
See All FindLaw Blogs >>
Go To Law and Daily Life Main Page >>
About Law and Daily Life Law and Daily Life strives to address the legal questions and circumstances that arise in our everyday lives, including the laws that affect our family life, workplace and personal finances. Have a comment or tip? Write to us.
Subscribe to this blog's feed
See all FindLaw RSS feeds
Subscribe to this blog's email newsletter Popular Topics California child custody child support civil rights divorce employment law gay marriage gay marriage legislation gay rights health care health care reform health insurance immigration marriage same sex marriage same-sex marriage school taxes unemployment unemployment benefits Categories Bankruptcy (34) Civil Rights (205) Employment Law (156) Estate Planning (21) Family Law (167) Finances (71) Health & Safety (54) Immigration Law (46) Insurance (39) Military (17) Real Estate Law (54) School Law (60) Tax (34) Traffic Laws (17) Archives Select a Month... December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 More Acknowledgments Acknowledgments - Page 2 Acknowledgments - Page 3 Acknowledgments - Page 4
FindLaw Legal VideosFind Chicago Personal Injury LawyersFind Chicago DUI Lawyers Search Law and Daily Life Recent Entries Home Buyer Tax Credit Extension 2010 On the Way? Mexico Files Brief in AZ Immigration Case Mass. School Won't Allow Pledge of Allegiance SEC Settles Wrongful Termination Suit for 5k AZ Immigration Law Headed to Supreme Court More Recent News FindLaw Blotter
Seattle 'Superheroes' Patrol Seattle by Night Injured
Katt Williams Fined 5K in Dog-Bites-Dog Case FindLaw Blotter
Man Drives Drunk While Watching Porn Injured
Brilliance of the Seas: Dozens Injured on Ship FindLaw Blotter
Diaper-Wearing 'Autistic' Man Cons Babysitters About this Entry This page contains a single entry by Laura Strachan published on December 6, 2010 12:06 PM.
Top 3 Things To Do When You Get Fired was the previous entry in this blog.
Best Ways to Avoid the Holiday Custody Crunch is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Copyright © FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters Business. All Rights Reserved.
var linkwithin_site_id = 341326;![]()



ShareThis